Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Francely v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv24027
Plaintiff:
Trent Francely
Defendant:
State of Florida, John Doe, Katherine Fernandez Rundle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Scott et al
as 8:2022cv00984
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gaston Harrell, III
Defendant:
Monique M. Scott and Agents, Companions, Accessories, and others named and unnamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL LEANDER COOPER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J K BUTLER, M SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Campani et al
as 8:2019cv03015
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thomas McBride
Defendant:
Diana Ayra, John Guzina, Michael Campani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Scott et al
as 1:2018cv04599
Defendant:
Officer C. Patterson, Officer A. Saleh, Officer M. Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Young et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Quartez T. Thomas
Defendant:
Robin Young and M. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Scott v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 15-14434
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR M. SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Alcemius v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2013cv80122
Plaintiff:
Christian Alcemius
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw , Unknown Agents of the United States Marshal Service (Miami Division) , Hart and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. TUCKER
as 5:2012cv00278
Petitioner:
VICTOR M SCOTT
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Davenport et al
as 5:2011cv00037
Petitioner:
Corey M Scott
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
