Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dante Hayward v. Brian Mundy, et al
as 23-12214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE BENJAMIN HAYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN MUNDY, CALEB GROVENSTEIN, F. GATES PEED and others
Hayward v. Peed et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Judge F. Gates Peed, Brian A. Deal and K-9 Sgt. Brian Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante Benjamin Hayward v. Brian Mundy, et al
as 23-11448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE BENJAMIN HAYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN MUNDY, Sergeant of K-9, Effingham Sheriff's Department, individual and official capacities, DEPUTY CALEB GROVENSTEIN, Effingham County Sheriff's Department, individual and official capacities, JUDGE F. GATES PEED, Individual and official capacities and others
Hayward v. Mundy et al
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Brian Mundy, Deputy Caleb Grovenstein, Judge F. Gates Peed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2015cv00506
Petitioner:
Rodney Mundy Whitehead
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brandon Mundy v. USA
as 15-12733
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON SHANE MUNDY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mundy v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv08050
Petitioner:
Brandon Shane Mundy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
David Mundy v. Secretary, FL DOC
as 14-11912
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE MUNDY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Harrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00810
Petitioner:
Mark Mundy Harrison
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Mundy et al
as 4:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Marshall Durell Brown
Defendant:
Brian A. Mundy, Gary Provost and Jimmy McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
