Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Brown v. Joe et al
as 1:2023cv02618
Petitioner:
Thomas Matthew Brown
Respondent:
President Biden Joe and First lady K. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Levett
as 1:2023cv02466
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Brown
Respondent:
Eric Levett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ottley v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Dante Jevon Ericson Ottley
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Thomas E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Richardson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01909
Petitioner:
Stevevanus Richardson
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Thomas E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
BROWN v. INCH
as 5:2020cv00117
Petitioner:
THOMAS EVERITT BROWN, IV
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al (Duval County)
as 3:2019cv00808
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Thomas Benjamin Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Marion County Jail Medical Department et al
as 5:2016cv00541
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bernard Brown
Defendant:
Marion County Jail Medical Department, Marion County Sheriff's Office, FNU Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Miree et al
as 2:2015cv01389
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bradley Brown
Defendant:
Angela Miree and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Roddam et al
as 2:2015cv01390
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bradley Brown
Defendant:
Roy Roddam and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Price et al
as 2:2015cv01126
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bradley Brown
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Roddam and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
