Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Makere v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 3:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Elias Makere
Defendant:
Martin Fitzpatrick, Charles J.F. Schreiber, Jr., Mark Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Walker v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
Mark Walker
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Efebo V. Demetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29816
Plaintiff:
MARK WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24392
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARKE WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17923
Plaintiff:
MARK WALKER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10916
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MARK WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45698
Plaintiff:
MARK WALKER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONCRIEFFE v. WALKER et al
as 4:2017cv00073
Petitioner:
BASIL MONCRIEFFE
Respondent:
MARK WALKER and GARY R JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCCRAY v. LEON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 4:2012cv00549
Petitioner:
MYRON MCCRAY
Respondent:
LEON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, STINSON, TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
