Cases 21 - 30 of 60
St. Clair County, Alabama v. Actavis LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00708
Plaintiff:
St. Clair County, Alabama
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma Inc, Allergan PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Ellis v. St Clair County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Cory L Ellis
Defendant:
St Clair County Sheriffs Office and Karen Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. St Clair County et al
as 4:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Booker
Defendant:
St Clair County, Peoples and Palmer
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bearden v. St Clair County, Ala District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2016cv01424
Plaintiff:
Rowdy Brent Bearden
Defendant:
St Clair County Ala District Attorney's Office and Rick Oliver
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. State of Alabama (The) et al
as 2:2015cv02214
Petitioner:
Terry Tatum
Respondent:
State of Alabama (The), St. Clair County Circuit Court and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridier v. St Clair County Jail
as 4:2015cv01622
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bridier
Defendant:
St Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01056
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Brown
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Inc., Jennifer Hairsine, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
