Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Potter et al v. Progressive American Insurance Company
as 8:2020cv02204
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Potter and Jolene Potter
Defendant:
Progressive American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78188
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SEITZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76552
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE SEITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74177
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73863
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE LEE PACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. Galloway, et al
as 8:2020cv01731
Defendant:
Robert G. Fegers, Captain Galloway, Deputy Jameson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64235
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63547
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VIRES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54679
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE VIRES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
