Cases 61 - 70 of 198
PERGROSSI v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2020cv00184
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2020cv00102
Plaintiff:
Precious Wiley
Defendant:
United States Government, Department of Veterans Affairs and Eisenhower Army Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dowdell v. United States Government (INMATE 2)
as 3:2020cv00475
Plaintiff:
Kirston Jermaine Dowdell
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Witherspoon v. United States Government et al
as 1:2020cv22602
Defendant:
Officials State Attorney's Office, United States Government, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. United States Government et al
as 6:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Indiana and City of Laporte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossotto v. United States Government
as 8:2020cv00703
Plaintiff:
Frank P. Rossotto
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rupp v. United States Government
as 9:2020cv80337
Defendant:
United States Government
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv00303
Defendant:
United States Government and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Alexander Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Co-Patent Owners US 6,889,615 v. United States Government
as 1:2020cv20189
Defendant:
United States Government
Plaintiff:
Co-Patent Owners US 6,889,615
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Daniel Cobble v. United States Government, et al
as 19-14764
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, KAREN DARLENE CASTLEBERRY, PAUL CURTIS LOCKHART and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
