Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Carter v. Darling et al
as 1:2012cv01511
Plaintiff:
Amber Carter
Defendant:
Mary Darling , Martin & Brunavs and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-11584
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crayton et al v. Armstrong International Inc et al
as 3:2011cv03912
Plaintiff:
Clarence Crayton , John K Atkinson , Don Haataja and others
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, A W Chesterton Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creasy et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03813
Plaintiff:
Lynda M. Creasy , Cecil Owens and Regina D. Parker
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. 3M et al
as 5:2011cv03367
Plaintiff:
Venise Faye Jones , Joe L. Allen , William McDaniel and others
Defendant:
3M , Anchor Darling Valve Company, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darling v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2011cv00502
Petitioner:
Kenneth Darling
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Affordable Bio Feedstock, Inc. v. Darling International Inc.
as 6:2011cv01301
Plaintiff:
Affordable Bio Feedstock, Inc.
Defendant:
Darling International Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Darling International Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Affordable Bio Feedstock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. Towncare Dental Partnership, INC.
as 1:2011cv22497
Plaintiff:
Darling Martinez
Defendant:
Towncare Dental Partnership, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Darling v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2010cv04027
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Darling
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darling v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2010cv00484
Plaintiff:
Jerry Darling
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
