Cases 1 - 10 of 410
Johnson v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv04046
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox and Et al
Petitioner:
Clinton Eric Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv04047
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv03964
Defendant:
Major Akie, Sheriff Melody Maddox, Sergeant Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
James Eldridge Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Bennett et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. McClellon, William B. Blitch, Gina Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Sheffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guthrie v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02871
Respondent:
Ms. Melody Maddox
Petitioner:
Wylie Lewis Guthrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv03573
Petitioner:
James Eldridge Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jett v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv03532
Petitioner:
Lashelton L. Jett
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02717
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Petitioner:
Deonta David
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Defendant:
Kathy K. Guidry, State of Georgia, Dana Laney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M. et al v. Melody Motel, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00984
Defendant:
Melody Motel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
S. M. and S. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
