Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Birmingham Luxury Motors, Inc. v. Mobile Luxury Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
Birmingham Luxury Motors, Inc.
Defendant:
Mobile Luxury Motors, LLC and Nadeem S. Mustafa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Orso v. Bhatti
as 6:2021mc00131
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com
Defendant:
Nadeem Bhatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
RAGAB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12488
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NADEEM RAGAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11803
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NADEEM ROSHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shanik v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2018cv00646
Plaintiff:
Nadeem Shanik
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
First Coast Energy v. Kalib Enterprises LLC et al
as 9:2011cv80261
Plaintiff:
First Coast Energy, LLP
Defendant:
Kalib Enterprises LLC , Sarah Khan and Nadeem Khan
Counter_claimant:
Kalib Enterprises LLC
Counter_defendant:
First Coast Energy, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Anwer v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 6:2008cv01254
Plaintiff:
Muhammed Nadeem Anwer
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States and Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
