Cases 51 - 60 of 745
BATTLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03441
Petitioner:
BERNARD BATTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IN RE: ANTONIO CRAWFORD
as 1:2019cv03269
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CRAWFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GASSEW v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2019cv03279
Petitioner:
JOHN JOSEPH GASSEW, JR., JOHN GASSEW and JOHN NEIL GASSEW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2019cv03044
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LITTLE v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2019cv02866
Defendant:
UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Petitioner:
MARVIN C. LITTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRIFFIN v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2019cv02791
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JOEL GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHULER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2019cv02343
Plaintiff:
MCALLEN HOSPITAL, L.P., MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC., SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Petitioner:
LAMONT DERRICK SHULER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2019cv02389
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SMITH and ELIJAH SMITH-WEEKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOWTY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv02418
Petitioner:
EARL D. DOWTY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GASSEW v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2019cv02390
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JOHN GASSEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
