Cases 1 - 10 of 53
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2023cv02758
Plaintiff:
ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS et al v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv00635
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS , CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA and AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Amicu:
EXPERTS ON THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO , FRED ROBARTS , GREGORY MTHEMBU-SALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
MILLEPEDE MARKETING LIMITED v. HARSLEY et al
as 1:2012cv00672
Plaintiff:
MILLEPEDE MARKETING LIMITED
Defendant:
ANDREW J. HARSLEY and RAPSTRAP, LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
NOVARTIS AG et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00821
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS AG and NOVARTIS CORPORATION
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
NOVARTIS AG v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00659
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS AG
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
ONCOLYTICS BIOTECH INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00621
Plaintiff:
ONCOLYTICS BIOTECH INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
NOVEN THERAPEUTICS, LLC v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00607
Plaintiff:
NOVEN THERAPEUTICS, LLC
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and MORPHOSYS AG
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
TELES AG et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00476
Plaintiff:
TELES AG and SIGRAM SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
H. LUNDBECK A/S v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
H. LUNDBECK A/S
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
