Cases 21 - 30 of 85
LONG et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00701
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff:
DAVID BURNHAM and SUSAN B. LONG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BIER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv00690
Plaintiff:
DAVID BIER
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HARPER v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
as 1:2020cv00252
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARPER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WALKER v. MATTHEW P. DONOVAN
as 1:2019cv03784
Plaintiff:
DAVID B WALKER and DAVID B. WALKER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and MATTHEW P. DONOVAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
KINARD v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv03743
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KINARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PETOFF v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv03558
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PETOFF
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FLIPPIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2019cv03483
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DAVID M. HARDY and JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
AMEER FLIPPIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JEMERIGBE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv03167
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL JEMERIGBE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2019cv02708
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT and U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
YANOFSKY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
as 1:2019cv02290
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Plaintiff:
DAVID YANOFSKY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
