Cases 1 - 10 of 192
KAMAL M AL-SULTAN COMPANY WLL v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2024cv02258
Defendant:
AVRIL HAINES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, GEN. MICHAEL E. KURILLA and others
Plaintiff:
KAMAL M AL-SULTAN COMPANY WLL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
EEON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01626
Defendant:
CHARLES W. SCHARF, SCOTT D. GILES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
EEON and EEON FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Robert Miller
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Frank Miller, also known as Robert Franklin Miller
Frank Deville v. PBGC
as 24-5029
Plaintiff:
Frank Deville
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
NEVILLE v. SUELZER et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Not Yet Classified:
TINA NEVILLE, MG Thomas Suelzer, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff:
TINA ANN NEVILLE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. SUELZER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Dominique Collier v. Frank Kendall, III
as 23-5291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dominique Collier, Captain
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Kendall, III, Honorable, Secretary of the Air Force
MOSES v. AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2023cv03239
Plaintiff:
LAUREN ASHLEY MOSES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, FRANK KENDALL and ALEX WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02746
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
MUSSINGTON et al v. DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023mc00093
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Thomas Coleman v. Frank Kendall, III
as 23-5190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas G. Coleman, Major, USAF (ret.)
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Kendall, III, The Honorable, Secretary of the Air Force
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
