Cases 11 - 17 of 17
WILSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
TERESA WILSON and KYLE COOPER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHOEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2015cv02036
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. SCHOEN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COOPER and POTOMAC SQUARE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. ARANA-JIMENEZ et al
as 1:2014cv01184
Plaintiff:
WARREN COOPER
Defendant:
JOSHUA ARANA-JIMENEZ, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, NANCY MERCEDES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COOPER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv01571
Plaintiff:
BRENDA COOPER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
TYLER et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00351
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. TYLER and DORIS TYLER
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL, INC., ASCO VALVES, INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A.F. OF L. -A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN et al v. BIOVAIL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2003mc00223
Defendant:
ELAN PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., BIOVAIL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., WALGREEN COMPANY, SHERMAN ACT and others
In Re:
NIFEDIPINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
PETERSON, et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC, et al
as 1:2001cv02094
Garnishee:
WORLD BANK, BANK OF JAPAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH D. PETERSON, ALICE GORDON, JOHN R. BLOCKER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, JAY GLENN and others
Claimant:
COOK COLLECTION ATTORNEYS, PLC and DAVID J. COOK, ESQ.
Special Master:
KAREN KRUGER, ANNIE PENNOK KAPLAN, ALAN LEE BALARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
