Cases 101 - 110 of 235
BROWN v. JACOBOSKY et al
as 1:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BROWN
Defendant:
ANNE JACOBOSKY, TINA WADDELL, MICHAEL MCGAUGHRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Keith Dougherty v. Mckee, et al
as 16-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Dougherty
Defendant - Appellee:
Mckee, Chief, Administator, Marsha Waldron, Chief Clerk, Scirica, Judge and others
MASHACK et al v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2015cv02107
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK MASHACK , KENNETH KATZ , JEFFREY M. AITKEN and others
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , JONATHAN B. JARVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Equitas Disability Advocates, v. David Bryant, et al
as 15-7127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
David A. Bryant and Frederick Daley
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 1:2015cv01780
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. MABUS et al
as 1:2015cv01669
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., SAM ERHART, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: DOMESTIC AIRLINE TRAVEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2015mc01404
Plaintiff:
JACK SNIADO, ARVIND SUNDAR, MICHAEL KROMAR and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100, FREDERICK ISAACSON, AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. and others
Special Master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
In Re:
IN RE: DOMESTIC AIRLINE TRAVEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Undetermined:
INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Frederick Foster v. PRC
as 15-1339
Petitioner:
Frederick Foster
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
