Cases 11 - 20 of 22
U.S. RIGHT TO KNOW et al v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
as 1:2017cv00423
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff:
U.S. RIGHT TO KNOW and CAREY GILLAM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ROUDABUSH v. RIPPLE et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN RIPPLE, INTAKE COUNSEL, SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACHIE v. CHARDONNET et al
as 1:2015cv00630
Plaintiff:
EDMOND K. MACHIE
Defendant:
BRENDAN H. CHARDONNET, KATHLEEN A. CAREY, ERIC ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. LAWHORNE, STERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST et al v. CITY OF AMARILLO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv01680
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARK WEST, SUSAN JEWELL WEST, DONALD JOSEPH WEST and others
Defendant:
CITY OF AMARILLO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT TAYLOR, PERRY GILLMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. BUSH et al
as 1:2012cv01825
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAREY et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2011cv00259
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. CAREY , KELLY S. EUSTIS and NATIONAL DEFENSE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARTER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2010cv01959
Plaintiff:
CAREY D. CARTER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARUNGA v. TEICHERT et al
as 1:2008cv00777
Plaintiff:
JAMES AGGREY-KWEEGGIR ARUNGA
Defendant:
RICHARD TEICHERT, ALISON LANDERS, AREVIK BAGDASSARI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAREY v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00292
Petitioner:
LLOYD CAREY
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
