Cases 11 - 20 of 39
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., v. TULI et al
as 1:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
SANJEEV TULI and MITUL TULI
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. CARRILLO
as 1:2017cv00800
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES T. CARRILLO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Theft of Satellite Communications Services
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., v. SANDOVAN, INC.
as 1:2017cv00801
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
SANDOVAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
BROOKS et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BROOKS , JOYCE BROOKS , DANNY BROOKS and others
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, BANK MELLI IRAN, MELLI BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. MIMI & D, LLC
as 1:2016cv01769
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MIMI & D, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. KELEMEWA CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00844
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
KELEMEWA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v DINDYAL
as 1:2014cv01121
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
BARRY DINDYAL and FUSION D & Q LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FANNING v. J&J/BMAR JOINT VENTURE, LLP
as 1:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
J&J/BMAR JOINT VENTURE, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
J.J. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
as 1:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
J. J. and C. J.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01704
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MOORE , B. M. , HELEN JONES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
