Cases 41 - 50 of 87
CARTERSVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, LLC et al v. HARGAN
as 1:2017cv02696
Plaintiff:
CARTERSVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, LLC , BAY AREA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD. , BAY HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Defendant:
ERIC D. HARGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
LASHER v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv01746
Plaintiff:
LENA LASHER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD, CHRISTOPHER S. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAKE et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
KELLI D. HAKE , DENISE YORK , RUSSEL YORK and others
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, BANK MELLI IRAN, MELLI BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
RANDOLPH v. USA
as 1:2016cv01225
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RONALD RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DANSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv01141
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH DANSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BURKS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
ALAN BURKS , ALISON BURKS MCRUIZ , SARAH DENMARK DENSON and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
BRANDYWINE HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
BRANDYWINE HOSPITAL , CAROLINAS HOSPITAL SYSTEM , HARTSELLE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SCHORR v. ROBERSON et al
as 1:2015cv01290
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. SCHORR
Defendant:
DENISE E. ROBERSON, RANDOLPH W. SAWYER, CASSANDRA A. MAXIMOUS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
KANAZEH v. RANDOLPH, BOYD, CHERRY PC et al
as 1:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
AFAF KANAZEH
Defendant:
RANDOLPH, BOYD, CHERRY PC, VAUGHN LAW FIRM and W.E. DIBRELL HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JU et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC Y. JU and DANA JU
Defendant:
RANDOLPH CARTER and ELIZABETH DENEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
