Cases 41 - 48 of 48
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GEIGER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00953
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARL GEIGER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, BRUCE SASSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRELL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00931
Plaintiff:
BERNETTA FARRELL, MARLANA MATTHEWS, CRYSTAL MCCOY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
BOOSE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BOOSE, STACEY CARTER, ANGELA GAY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALLEN et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
JEANNE ALLEN, DENISE JOHNSON, LINDA DAVIS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agapito, Bridget, et al v. DC, et al
as 08-7004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hashima Agapito, A minor by parent and next friend Bridget Agapito, Destiny Barnes, A minor by parent and next friend Alethea Barnes, Rachon Bethea, A minor by parent and next friend Lakisha Bethea and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia and Clifford B. Janey, (Officially) Superintendent, D.C. Public Schools
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
