Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY NATHAN HERRMANN
as 1:2024mc00103
Unknown:
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY NATHAN HERRMANN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv02052
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Plaintiff:
Nathan Littauer Hospital
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HAMLET HMA LLC v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01455
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and HAMLET HMA LLC doing business as SANDHILLS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GLEN FALLS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FARRON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
JULIANA FARRON, SHAHAR BAUSI, NOA BAUSI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
AKTER v. FLOOK
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
FATEMA AKTER
Defendant:
NATHAN FLOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
