Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PIERCE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02296
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAMALA D. HARRIS, VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS
as 1:2017cv02299
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2016cv02055
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEDERAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION, DANE R. GILLETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02058
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, KAMALA D. HARRIS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016mc01312
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PIERCE v. OBAMA
as 1:2016cv00354
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. WASHINGTON POST et al
as 1:2016mc00297
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST, WASHINGTON TIMES, WASHINGTON EXAMINER and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PIERCE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv02161
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
JONATHAN M. SMITH and BARACK H. OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2015mc00369
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, PIERCE V. GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PIERCE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, PIERCE V. GONZALEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
