Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Perlman v. General Electric
as 23-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant: Carol Perlman
Defendant / Appellee: General Electric, GE Healthcare, H. Lawrence Culp, Jr. and others
Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 22-2689
Plaintiff / Appellant: Leonid Falberg, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan
Defendant / Appellee: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan Retirement Committee
Defendant: John Does 1-20
Aracich v. The Board of Trustees of The Employee Benefit Fund
as 22-2544
Plaintiff / Appellant: Matthew Aracich
Defendant / Appellee: The Board of Trustees of The Employee Benefit Funds of Heat & Frost Insulators Local 12, The Employee Benefit Funds of Heat & Frost Insulators Local 12, The Board of Trustees of The Pension Fund of Heat And Frost Insulators Local 12 Plan and others
Oriska Corporation v. Troy Operating Co. LLC
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Troy Operating Co. LLC, (Diamond) Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC, Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appearClass Defendant, Annette Hall, Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Giantonio v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
as 18-2034
Plaintiff: John J. Giantonio, on behalf of the Chicago Bridge & Iron Savings Plan, The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan, himself and a class consisting of similarly situated participants of the Plans
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ramesh C. Kinra
Defendant: John Does 1-20 and Richard Roes, 1-20
Defendant - Appellant: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, Investment Committee, Plan Administrator and others
Giantonio v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
as 18-1886
Plaintiff: John J. Giantonio, on behalf of the Chicago Bridge & Iron Savings Plan, The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan, himself and a class consisting of similarly situated participants of the Plans
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Ramesh C. Kinra
Defendant - Appellee: Travis Stricker
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, Investment Committee, Plan Administrator and others
Defendant: John Does 1-20 and Richard Roes, 1-20
Cooper v. DST Systems, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2805
Plaintiff - Appellant: Clive V. Cooper, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated plan participants, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant - Appellee: Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc.
Defendant: DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan, The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?