Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Medley v. Decker
as 20-631
Defendant / Appellant:
Chad F. Wolf, as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Thomas Decker, as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity and William P. Barr, as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Leon Leonard Medley
Liranzo de la Cruz v. Decker
as 19-3831
Not Yet Classified:
Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Kevin K. McAleenan, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Liranzo de la Cruz and others
Padilla Raudales v. Decker
as 19-3220
Not Yet Classified:
Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting United States Secretary of Homeland Security, Jose Celan Padilla Raudales, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Nunez v. Decker
as 19-2113
Not Yet Classified:
Thomas Decker, as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Jose De Jesus Nunez, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Desir v. Holder
as 10-4471
Petitioner:
Peguy Widny Desir
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General and Mary Ann Gantner, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration & Customs Enforcement, New York District
Kendall v. Holder
as 10-3553
Petitioner:
Cyril Nathanaiel Kendall
Respondent:
Mary Ann Gantner, District Director U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
