Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Women of Color for Equal Justice v. The City of New York
as 22-3065
Plaintiff:
Jo Saint-George, Esq.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Women of Color For Equal Justice, Remo Dello Ioio, Elizabeth Loiacono and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Eric L. Adams, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Pare v. Valet Park of America
as 21-3109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Warren Louis Pare
Defendant / Appellee:
John Hogan, Esq., represented plaintiff in Fort Edward, New York Traffic Court and John M. Hogan, III
Defendant:
Valet Park of America, Jordan Pare, Cindy L. Pare and others
Brooks v. Hogan
as 21-1785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Brooks
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Hogan, Former OMH Commissioner, Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Maureen Bosco, Executive Director, CNYPC and others
Defendant:
Emmet Creahan, Director of Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Fourth Department, Michael J. Hungerford, Deputy Chief Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Brooks v. Hogan
as 21-1571
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Anthony Gonzalez, Director of Risk Management, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Michael Larkin, SCTA-2; Office of Mental Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Brooks
Defendant:
Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Dr. Kumar Bahl, Psychiatrist, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Craig P. Schlanger, Senior Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
In re: New York City Board of
as 21-723
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lisa Hogan
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Hogan v. United States of America
as 20-4109
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martin Hogan
Rosado, et al v. Maxymillian et al
as 20-3965
Plaintiff:
Ryan Przesiek, John Suggs, Raymond Lagree and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Terri Maxymillian, Sex Offender Treatment Program Director, Peter Russell, Acting Executive Director of CNYPC, FKA Maureen Bosco, Jeff Nowicki, Sex Offender Treatment Program Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Rosado
Brooks v. Hogan
as 20-1779
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Anthony Gonzalez, Director of Risk Management, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Michael Larkin, SCTA-2; Office of Mental Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Brooks
Defendant:
Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Dr. Kumar Bahl, Psychiatrist, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Craig P. Schlanger, Senior Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Weaver v. Schiavo
as 20-770
Defendant / Appellee:
Salvatore Farruto, McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, LLC, Maria G. Rosa, in her official capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court, County of Dutchess and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Everette Weaver
Defendant:
Bradford Kendall, in his official capacity as, Clerk of Dutchess County
Brooks v. Hogan
as 20-675
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Former Central New York Psychiatric Center Executive Director, Dr. Terri Maxymillian, Chief of Psychology Central New York Psychiatric Center, Kyle Velte, Former Psychologist Central New York Psychiatric Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Brooks
Defendant / Appellee:
Laura Creaser Smith, Former Nurse Central New York Psychiatric Center, Elizabeth Farnum, Psychiatrist Central New York Psychiatric Center, David Parrish, Secure Care Treatment Assistant Central New York Psychiatric Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
