Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Oval Capital Limited Liability Company et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate/Policy No. 798200, Authority Ref NO B174010045SS22
as 1:2024cv02661
Plaintiff:
OVAL CAPITAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (d/b/a OVAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT), TIFERET VENTURES, LLC and Oval Capital Limited Liability Company doing business as Oval Capital Management
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE/POLICY NO. 798200, AUTHORITY REF NO B174010045SS22 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate/Policy No. 798200, Authority Ref NO B174010045SS22
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of London v. Qantas Airways Limited
as 1:2022cv06221
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, PMY ETS USA, INC. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Defendant:
Qantas Airways, Ltd. and Qantas Airways Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al v. Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv05151
Cross Defendant:
Swiss International Air Lines Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company, Swiss Re International SE, Luxembourg, Zurich Branch and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant:
ISS Action, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Railroad Insurance Underwriters v. Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London et al
as 1:2007cv03071
Plaintiff:
Railroad Insurance Underwriters
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London, Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London, Excess Insurance Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wynn et al v. Lloyd's, London et al
as 1:2007cv00202
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wynn and Elaine Wynn
Defendant:
Lloyd's, London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
