Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
SL-X IP S.A.R.L. v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Credit Suisse Group AG, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and others
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04893
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant:
Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Puerto Rico Government Employees and Judiciary Retirement Systems Administration v. BofA Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03261
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Police Retirement System of St. Louis v. BofA Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03122
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, IN ITS INDIVIDUAL AND CUSTODIAL CAPACITIES, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Credit Suisse (USA) LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
The Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System v. Bank of America, N.A et al
as 1:2019cv03091
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02900
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies Group LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Police Retirement System of St. Louis and PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UFCW Local 1776 and Participating Employers Pension Fund v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02755
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
UFCW Local 1776 and Participating Employers Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Dallas Area Rapid Transit Employees Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Trust et al v. Bank of America, N.A et al
as 1:2019cv02715
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Pension Fund and Dallas Area Rapid Transit Employees Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
