Cases 11 - 20 of 5,676
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Harold Bailey Gallison
as 24-2104
Defendant:
WARRIOR GIRL CORP., Carl Kruse-Velasquez, MARK S. DRESNER and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Moss v. Board of Education of the Sachem Central School District
as 24-2096
Defendant:
WILLIAM (BILL) COGGIN, individually and in their official capacities, MATT PERLONGO, individually and in their official capacities, VINCENT REYNOLDS, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KING MOSS, III
Oseni v. Mahoney
as 24-2095
Petitioner:
KAYODE OSENI
Respondent:
WILLIAM S. MAHONEY, Senior Parole Officer, N.Y.S. DOCCS Community Supervision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-2074
Defendant:
JORGE RIVERA, GEDEON TORRES, PHILLIP KLOSKOWSKI and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams-Bey
as 24-2063
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTWANE WILLIAMS-BEY and Buck
Franco v. Gunsalus
as 24-2061
Defendant:
CITY OF SYRACUSE, Police Officer SHAWN KELLY, 279, all sued herein in their capacity as individuals, Police Officer JOHN GUNSALUS, 0453, all sued herein in their capacity as individuals and others
Plaintiff:
MARIO FRANCO
United States of America v. Cosme
as 24-2042
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
William R. Cosmo, Sealed Defendant 1 and WILLIAM R. COSME
United States of America v. Williams
as 24-2032
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Sealed Defendant 1, BEVELYN BEATTY WILLIAMS, EDMEE CHAVANNES and others
United States of America v. Burgos (Virk)
as 24-2017
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BURGOS, Sealed Defendant 2, MICHAEL GIAN WILLIAM HABIB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
