Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Ingram v. Neptune Auto Transport LLC
as 1:2024cv06591
Plaintiff:
Travis Ingram
Defendant:
Neptune Auto Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-2074
Defendant:
JORGE RIVERA, GEDEON TORRES, PHILLIP KLOSKOWSKI and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davidson v. Office of Court Administration
as 24-1331
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVIDSON
Defendant:
OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, Hon. LAWRENCE MARKS, in his official capacity and personally, ALIA RAZZAQ, in her official capacity as Chief Clerk of the New York City Civil Court and others
Florio v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1177
Plaintiff:
SYED ZAHEER and TRAVIS FLORIO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Weiss v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
Gervat v. Freda et al
as 1:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Fabrizio Freda, Ronald S. Lauder, Leonard A. Lauder and others
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Treusch
as 2:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Travis Treusch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Treusch
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Travis Treusch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Mullins v. Novatech et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Avis Mullins
Defendant:
INC NOVATECH, CYNTHIA PETION, EDDY PETION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
United States of America v. Hicks
as 24-271
Defendant:
MARCEL WORTHY, RODERICK ARRINGTON, LETORRANCE TRAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AARON HICKS, Boog and Boogy
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
