Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Social Security Office
as 1:2023cv03196
Plaintiff:
Sherry Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ngambo v. Social Security Administration
as 7:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Jules Ngambo
Defendant:
Social Security Office Information and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Sonnick v. Social Security Offices Syracuse et al
as 5:2020cv00413
Defendant:
Social Security Offices Syracuse and ALJ Bruce Fein
Plaintiff:
Vincent Sonnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. New York Central Mutual et al
as 1:2019cv01354
Defendant:
Media Press General Manager, Crieg Menear, New York Central Mutual and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riordan v. Social Security Office, Jamaica et al
as 1:2018cv03760
Defendant:
Manager Social Security Office, Jamaica, Manage Supervisor Social Security Office, Flushing, Supervisor Social Security Office, Jamaica and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Riordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Hyland v. Social Security Office of the General Counsel
as 1:2013cv03329
Plaintiff:
Dean Roderick Hyland
Defendant:
Social Security Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Capurso v. Radio Shack et al
as 1:2012cv02704
Plaintiff:
Victor Capurso
Defendant:
Radio Shack, Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., Virgin Mobile, Phone Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chaney v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2011cv01739
Plaintiff:
Carla D. Chaney
Defendant:
United States District Court, Alvin Thompson, Beatrice M. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
