Cases 21 - 30 of 611
Sanchez v. Colvin et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Dajohn Sanchez
Defendant:
John Colvin, Nurse Five Points Perez, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Perez Badge no. 3272 et al
as 2:2023cv08623
Plaintiff:
Jerome Washington
Defendant:
C.O. Perez Badge no. 3272, Sheriff Edward Reilly, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Howard v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Jason Howard
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Perez v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01348
Petitioner:
Raul Rivera-Perez
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
O'Neill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Devin O'Neill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Martin, Oles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. UCONN Health et al
as 3:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Tyrrell Brown
Defendant:
UCONN Health Dept. of Otolaryngology, C.E.O., Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Hooper et al
as 9:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Carlos Perez
Defendant:
C.O. Lori Hooper, Sgt. Bernard Stevens, C.O. John Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Quintana et al
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Samuel Quintana, Perez and Marcus Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. UConn Health Dept of Otalaryngology et al
as 3:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Tyrrell Brown
Defendant:
UConn Health Dept of Otalaryngology, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Colvin et al
as 1:2023cv09514
Plaintiff:
Dajohn Sanchez
Defendant:
John Colvin, Nurse Five Points Perez, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
