Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Stapleton v. Ridge et al
as 6:2008cv06348
Petitioner:
Floyel Stapleton
Respondent:
Tom Ridge, James Hayes, Jr., Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ziemba v. Murphy et al
as 3:2008cv01090
Plaintiff:
Duane Ziemba
Defendant:
Brian K. Murphy, Theresa Lantz, Mark Strange and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lesane v. Moore et al
as 1:2008cv04828
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Lesane
Defendant:
D. Moore, Tom and The Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justice v. King et al
as 1:2008cv00351
Plaintiff:
John D. Justice
Defendant:
Terry King, Saving Grace Ministries, Inc., Eugenio Russi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lugo v. Johnson et al
as 1:2008cv01733
Plaintiff:
Manuel Lugo
Defendant:
Robert T. Johnson, Daniel D. Brownwell, Donald Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webster v. Fischer et al
as 9:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Webster
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Michael Corcoran, Michael C. Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Stevens et al
as 1:2007cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Odom
Defendant:
Donald Stevens, Timothy Lewalski, Gerald Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 9:2007cv01218
Petitioner:
Jan Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael Mukasey, G.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv00224
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Patrick J. Leahy, G. W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willey v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 6:2007cv06484
Plaintiff:
Aaron Willey
Defendant:
Robert A. Kirkpatrick, M. Monahan, Martain Kerney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
