Cases 11 - 20 of 323
Cumming v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Cumming
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boykin v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2024cv02865
Defendant:
Jermaine Boykin, County Of Westchester, Lemar Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krick v. Town of Lyons et al
as 6:2024cv06178
Plaintiff:
Mr. Joshua Krick and Joshua Krick
Defendant:
Town of Lyons, Mr. Michael Bouwens, Marc Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cummings v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Krystal Lee Cummings
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Baker v. Amaral et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Lewis Baker
Defendant:
Walter Amaral, Doug Bewsher, Scott Genereux and others
Cummings v. John Doe OMH Provider et al
as 1:2023cv11184
Plaintiff:
Najay Cummings
Defendant:
John Doe OMH Provider, John Doe/Jane Doe Psychiatrist and John Doe/Jane Doe Pharmacists
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Ricky Chadwick Cummings
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Rooney v. Amaral et al
as 1:2023cv08570
Plaintiff:
Patrick Rooney
Defendant:
Walter D. Amaral, Doug Bewsher, Daniel Boncel and others
Cummings v. Larocco et al
as 2:2023cv08407
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Cummings
Defendant:
(Sheriff) Anthony Larocco, (Med.Director) Donna Henig and (Socail Worker) Ms. Vicktarelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
