Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Singleton v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv05455
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Singleton
Defendant:
City Of New York, Darian Shannon, Michael Gandolfi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Smith, III
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Defendant:
Abilene Motor Express and Timothy James Smith
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Smith v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03976
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ceparano v. Suffolk County
as 14-311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony J. Ceparano
Defendant - Appellee:
Suffolk County, New York, Steve Levy, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Ceparano v. Suffolk County
as 14-311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony J. Ceparano
Defendant / Appellee:
Suffolk County, New York, Steve Levy, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Morgan v. Hassan
as 13-2695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Haywood Randolph Morgan
Defendant - Appellee:
Niema Hassan, Case Manager, Shield #991815, Arelne Goldberg, Jackson and others
Blackwell v. The Bakery and Confectionery U
as 12-4839
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ronald Blackwell, Leslie Durham, Randall Farmer and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund, John Beck, Plant Manager and Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fun Board of Trustees
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
