Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Pinero v. Clark et al
as 7:2010cv04803
Plaintiff:
Frankie Pinero
Defendant:
William J. Clark, Thomas Zugibe, Maria T DeSimone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinero v. Clark et al
as 1:2010cv04803
Plaintiff:
Frankie Pinero
Defendant:
William J. Clark, Thomas Zugibe, Maria T DeSimone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinero v. Clark et al
as 1:2010cv04803
Plaintiff:
Frankie Pinero
Defendant:
William J. Clark, Thomas Zugibe, Maria T DeSimone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscoll v. DeLaRosa
as 1:2010cv04409
Plaintiff:
Michael Driscoll
Defendant:
Neyda DeLaRosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capellupo v. Nassau Health Care Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv03720
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Capellupo
Defendant:
Nassau Health Care Corporation, Nassau County Police Department, I. Qazi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv07774
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Rodriguez
Defendant:
The City of New York, Manuel DeLaRosa and John Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2004cv04476
Plaintiff:
Alex B. Parker, Christopher Adeniyi, Olubunmi Olayemi Ajayi and others
Defendant:
City of New York and The New York City Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Delarosa v. USA
as 1:2008cv03642
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Billy Delarosa
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Malloy v. Bellington et al
as 1:2007cv05225
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malloy
Defendant:
Carl Bellington, Dione Vega, Redd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delarosa et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv06562
Plaintiff:
Evan Delarosa and Michael Eligon
Defendant:
The City of New York, Thomas Garrity, Thomas Garrity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
