Cases 81 - 90 of 2,217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schultz v. Weatherhunters, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02852
Plaintiff:
William Schultz
Defendant:
Weatherhunters, Inc., Al Roker Entertainment, Inc., Al Roker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Utter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02805
Plaintiff:
Lisa A Utter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gedney v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Gedney
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Mercy Investment Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02636
Plaintiff:
Amanda Reynolds
Defendant:
Mercy Investment Services, Inc., Mercy Education System of the Americas, Sisters of Mercy of The Americas Mid-Atlantic Community, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Frye v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Lisa Frye
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Conner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Lisa Conner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Worthy v. Rodwin et al
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Worthy
Defendant:
Lisa Rodwin and David S. Sarkovics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scovell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Scovell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
