Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Williams, et al v. USP Lewisburg PA, et al
as 10-1300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY FAISON WILLIAMS, (on behalf of Louis T. Faison, Jr., deceased) and LOUIS T. FAISON, SR.
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
VETA BELL FAISON
Defendant - Appellee:
USP LEWISBURG, medical staff and guards
Defendant - Non-Participating:
UNION CTY CORONER
James Yancey, et al v. Thomas Corbett, Jr.
as 09-4366
Plaintiff - Non-Participating:
DAVID LEE BARCLAY, SR., ALLAN D. BUYNA, RAFAEL COLON and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS FERRI
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Shawn Lockett, Sr. v. Dominick Derose
as 09-3561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN A. LOCKETT, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DOMINICK DEROSE
Reuben Jacobs, Sr. v. A Robert Depersia Agency
as 09-3108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REUBEN A. JACOBS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
A ROBERT DEPERSIA AGCY
Leonard Williamson, Sr. v. Alghny Corr Health, et al
as 09-2617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD T. WILLIAMSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ALGHNY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SER, DANA M. PHILLIPS, Health Care Administrator, PATTERSON and others
George Hastings, Sr. v. Williams Hallgan, et al
as 09-2311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HASTINGS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAMS G. HALLGAN, Lawyer and KEATON, Lawyer
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 08-4869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Warden, FCI Fort Dix and FED BUR PRISONS
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Gronolsky, et al
as 08-3995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant:
GRONOLSKY, MED DEPT, PHARM DEPT and others
Cassius Clay, Sr. v. Jeffrey Beard
as 08-3520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASSIUS M. CLAY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, CANDIS BRIMMER, SHARON BURKS and others
Defendant:
JOANNE MILLER, RICHARD GAYDOS and LAWRENCE P. BENNING
Hairston v. Gronolsky
as 08-2641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant:
GRONOLSKY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
