Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 27,157
Jose Juarez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2423
Petitioner: JOSE JERONIMO JUAREZ
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Belal Lami
as 24-2408
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BELAL LAMI
USA v. Kenneth Hampton
as 24-2417
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KENNETH HAMPTON
Assistive Choices Inc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2422
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner: ASSISTIVE CHOICES INC
Stratton PeayIn re: Stratton Peay
as 24-2382
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner: In re: STRATTON PEAY
USA v. Upendra Aduru
as 24-2387
Defendant: UPENDRA ADURU
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles G. Berwind Trust, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2360
Petitioner: TRUST UNDER THE TRUST OF CHARLES G. BERWIND TRUST, F/B/O David M. Berwind, Jr., Valerie L. Pawson, D. Michael Berwind, Jr., David M. Berwind III and Richard D.R. Berwind, Trustees, TRUST UNDER THE TRUST OF CHARLES G. BERWIND TRUST, F/B/O Linda Berwind Shappy, Linda Berwind Shappy, Russsell F. Shappy, Jr., and Dennis R. Delaney, Trustees and TRUST UNDER THE TRUST OF CHARLES G. BERWIND TRUST, F/B/O Gail Berwind Warden, Gail Berwind Warden, Duncan C. Warden and Dennis R. Delaney, Trustees, all as successor trusts to the Charles G. Berwind Trust
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Duncan Warden, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2361
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner: GAIL WARDEN and DUNCAN WARDEN
Russell Shappy, Jr., et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2362
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner: LINDA B. SHAPPY and RUSSELL SHAPPY, JR.
Siavosh HenarehIn re: Siavosh Henareh
as 24-2401
Petitioner: In re: SIAVOSH HENAREH
Respondent: WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI MEDIUM and CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?