Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Deandre Jones v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 24-2158
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY INDIANA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE PAYTON JONES
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS, LAEL BROWN, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant:
N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Correction and others
Charles Jones v. Jerry Hobeck, et al
as 24-1802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, Police Officer, JUDITH P. PETRUSH, District Attorney and FRANK PALLONE, JR., Magisterial District Judge
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Antonio Jones v. NJ Doc Central Transportation, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., DR. JAMES K. LIU, Rutgers Neurosurgeon and others
Marcellus Jones v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 24-1307
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DENISE SMITH, JAMES BRESHAHN and others
Damile Mitchell v. Earl Jones, et al
as 24-1308
Plaintiff:
DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant:
EARL J. JONES, Deputy Superintendent for Facility, BRIAN FLINCHBAUGH, Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services, CAMPBELL, Captain at SCI-Albion and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
