Cases 31 - 40 of 92
USA v. Juan Ramo
as 17-2720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JUAN H. RAMOS
Jaime Sosa-Ramos v. Attorney General United State
as 17-2338
Petitioner:
JAIME SOSA-RAMOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luis Ramos v. New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 17-2046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Manuel Ramos v. Cowan Systems LLC, et al
as 17-1082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
COWAN SYSTEMS and THOMAS J. HUDAK, JR.
Estate of Ubaldo N. Ramos, et al v. City of Lancaster, et al
as 16-4110
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF UBALDO N. RAMOS, by and through Aida DeJesus, Administrator of the Estate of Ubaldo N. Ramos
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIDA DEJESUS, Individually, Administratrix of the Estate of Ubaldo Ramos
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LANCASTER, HENRY C. BARRIE, GARY MCCRADY and others
Teodoro Reyes Aguilar, et al v. Attorney General United State
as 16-3921
Petitioner:
TEODORO ALFREDO REYES AGUILAR, ANA VICTORIA RAMOS DE REYES, ALFREDO RAFAEL REYES-RAMOS and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Ramo
as 16-2891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE RAMOS
Hugo Ramos v. Attorney General United State
as 16-2002
Petitioner:
HUGO MIGUEL DUARTE RAMOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
El Aemer El Mujaddid v. Lynn Wehling, et al
as 16-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EL AEMER EL MUJADDID
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN A. WEHLING, in her individual and official capacity in personam, TIMOTHY CODISPOTI, in his official and official capacity in personam, PATILUCCI, in his individual and official capacity in personam and others
Pedro Ramos Romero v. Attorney General United State
as 16-1208
Petitioner:
PEDRO RAMOS ROMERO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
