Cases 1 - 10 of 69
In Re: Timothy C. Saunders
as 24-1293
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY C. SAUNDERS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Timothy SaundersIn re: Timothy Saunders
as 23-3056
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY C. SAUNDERS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Saunders v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 23-2629
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY C. SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Lamont Saunders v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Robert SaundersIn re: Robert Saunders
as 22-2995
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT SAUNDERS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
DeJuan Saunders v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 22-2830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEJUAN SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Timothy Saunders v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 22-1841
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY C. SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI
Antonio Saunders v. BB&T Bank, et al
as 22-1797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
BB&T BANK, formerly known as BRANCH BANKING & TRUST, DETECTIVE MICHAEL MUNCH and DETECTIVE GARY HAMMER
Defendant:
JAMIE ADAMS, BB&T BANK, GARY HAMMER and others
Antonio Saunders v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 22-1718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
