Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOLDSTEIN v. PRESIDENT AND CHIEF COUNSELOR DEPT. OF HEALTH, WASHINGTON, DC et al
as 2:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
DAAIYAH HANIFAH GOLDSTEIN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF COUNSELOR DEPT. OF HEALTH, WASHINGTON, DC, JEFFERSON HOSPITAL, OBGYN/IVF CLINIC, REGIONAL MANAGER BARBARA HOLLAND OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02485
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW HOLLAND BOROUGH, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2017cv05034
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW HOLLAND BOROUGH, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , DONALD L. BOWERS, JR. , WENDELL L. METZLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2016cv01900
Plaintiff:
PHILIPPE HOLLAND
Defendant:
MITCHELL FARRELL , KEVIN HANVEY and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
