Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2012cv01850
Plaintiff:
TONY BANKS
Defendant:
NATE HARPER, FREEMAN, SMELTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CLIFTON v. FREEMAN et al
as 3:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
DEREK ANTHONY CLIFTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL FREEMAN, SUPERINTENDENT BRITTON, MAJOR HOLLENBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2012cv00155
Petitioner:
JAMES NICOLAS FREEMAN
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHATMAN v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH PA et al
as 2:2011cv00638
Plaintiff:
EUGENE E. CHATMAN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH PA, THIROS, FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRULL v. SOUTHWORTH et al
as 1:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. KRULL
Defendant:
RICHARD SOUTHWORTH , GERALD RYAN , JOHN FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARTELLI v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv01629
Plaintiff:
KEITH BARTELLI
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , JEFFREY BEARD , LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
COLLINS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2010cv00702
Plaintiff:
JEFF COLLINS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , NATHAN HARPER , FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOGUE v. WEST PENN MULTI-LIST, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. LOGUE
Defendant:
WEST PENN MULTI-LIST, INC., HOWARD HANNA REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., COLDWELL BANKER REAL ESTATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
