Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
In re: Andre Gay
as 13-1472
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: ANDRE GAY
Defendant - Respondent: CONNER BLAINE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
USA v. Blaine Handerhan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3500
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BLAINE R. HANDERHAN
In re: Steven Romansky
as 12-2335
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: STEVEN L. ROMANSKY
Defendant: CONNER BLAINE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAYNE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Richard Flood
as 12-1734
Petitioner: In re: RICHARD FLOOD
Respondent: CONNER BLAINE, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
USA v. Blaine Claxton
as 10-2862
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BLAINE CLAXTON
LEWIS v. BLAINE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2000cv03274
Petitioner: REGINALD S. LEWIS
Respondent: CONNER BLAINE, JR. , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LYNN ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL D. FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FISHER v. BEARD, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2002cv01764
Petitioner: JONATHAN FISHER
Respondent: JEFFREY BEARD , CONNOR BLAINE and JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
USA v. Blaine Claxton
as 09-3155
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BLAINE CLAXTON
In Re: Bailey
as 09-2206
Petitioner: DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent: CONNER BLAINE, DA ALGHNY, ATTY GEN PA and others
USA v. Ethen Blaine White
as 09-1260
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ETHEN BLAINE WHITE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?