Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MCDOWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv03635
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, THE OFFICE OF THE HOMELESS, APPLE TREE FAMILY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDOWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.
as 2:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, APPLE TREE FAMILY CENTRAL and LUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennifer McDowell v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 22-2122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SHAMIRRA LLOYD, NORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTER CUA 1 and others
MCDOWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SHAMIRRA LLOYD, NORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTER CUA 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALHOUN v. FLAGGAN et al
as 2:2020cv04869
Defendant:
APPLE ONE and MICHELLE FLAGGAN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OPATHY CALHOUN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arunachalam v. Gordon et al
as 1:2020cv01020
Defendant:
Edward L. Tulin, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BESSON v. COOK
as 5:2018cv05657
Defendant:
APPLE INC. and TIM COOK
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BESSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITHERSPOON v. APPLE
as 2:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
APPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
APPLE BAIL BONDS, INC. v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2014cv02733
Plaintiff:
APPLE BAIL BONDS, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, CITY OF PATERSON POLICE DEPT., MOHAMMAD MAHMOUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APPLING v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02220
Plaintiff:
OMAR APPLING
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGEL COLLINS, LAEL NEWSOME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
