General Cases filed in New Jersey
SMITH v. DIRECTOR
as 1:2023cv00916
Petitioner: Randall Todd Smith
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID and DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BACON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01116
Respondent: GOVERNOR PHILLIP D. MURPHY, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, RANDALL K. MCCUTCHEON and others
Petitioner: THOMAS BACON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VENZIE v. ROBINSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv16191
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GEORGE O. ROBINSON
Petitioner: RANDALL K. VENZIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANDALL v. NOGAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv17638
Petitioner: DONALD RANDALL
Respondent: MR. PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOPKINS v. PAMARO et al
as 2:2017cv05147
Petitioner: RANDALL ALBERT HOPKINS
Respondent: DANIEL PAMARO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. MULLER et al
as 2:2012cv00684
Petitioner: RANDAL ASTON ALLEN
Respondent: WAYNE MULLER, RUBEN PEREZ, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VENZIE v. YATAURO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv07404
Petitioner: RANDALL K. VENZIE
Defendant: MEG A. YATAURO and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FUTCH v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv02530
Petitioner: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent: J. GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FUTCH v. WARDEN J GRONDOLOSKY
as 1:2008cv04378
Petitioner: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent: WARDEN J GRONDOLOSKY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?