Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BROWN v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv04924
Plaintiff:
MS. KIMBERLY BROWN and KIMBERLY BROWN
Defendant:
MAYOR MAURICE CLARK, SR., OFFICER DONALD QUICK, OFFICER MICHAEL HALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff:
CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZCONA v. FLORES et al
as 3:2018cv05108
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
ALEX FLORES, RAYMOND QUICK and THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Forrest v. Nedab, et al
as 12-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
FORREST v. NEDAB et al
as 2:2011cv07773
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-MAS QUICK v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2010cv03072
Plaintiff:
TYRONE QUICK
Defendant:
ROBINSON and WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. SACHS et al
as 2:2009cv02754
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
WAYNE SACHS, EVAN SILVERSTEIN and KEITH QUICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elias Jimenez v. York City Pol Dept
as 08-1769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIAS JIMENEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
QUICK RESPONSE TEAM
Defendant - Non-Participating:
JEFF SPENCE and YORK CITY POL DEPT
QUICK v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05389
Plaintiff:
ROBERT QUICK
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40, JOAN DOES 1-40 and plc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
