Contract Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Crossroads Mall Limited Partnership v. William H. Lane, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00369
Plaintiff: Crossroads Mall Limited Partnership
Defendant: William H. Lane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Small Business Admn v. Birdie Cap Corp
as 09-1409
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: BIRDIE CAP CORP
Small Business Admn v. Hamaayan Fountain of Jewish Cu
as 09-1412
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: HAMAAYAN FOUNTAIN OF JEWISH CULTURE INST, INC
Small Business Admn v. Mark Barbera
as 09-1410
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: MARK BARBERA
Small Business Admn v. Gerald Goldberg
as 09-1413
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: GERALD GOLDBERG
Small Business Admn v. Michael Novio
as 09-1414
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL NOVIO
Small Business Admn v. Samuel Teitelbaum
as 09-1408
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: SAMUEL TEITELBAUM, aka Sammy Teitelbaum
Small Business Admn v. Charles Beal
as 09-1411
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: CHARLES O. BEALS
Small Business Admn v. James Scott, et al
as 09-1402
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES SCOTT and GWENDOLYN SCOTT
Small Business Admn v. Steven Hirsch
as 09-1401
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMALL BUSINESS ADMN, As Received for Penny Lane Partners, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant: STEVEN HIRSCH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?