Cases 21 - 30 of 52
SHAW et al v. KREIZER et al
as 3:2019cv12237
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, DAVID P. KREIZER, LLC, KRISTEN FONE and others
Plaintiff:
JUDD SHAW, P.A. and JUDD B. SHAW, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv17559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BOHORQUEZ et al v. DE MORENO PIRAQUIVE et al
as 2:2017cv05075
Plaintiff:
DORIS BOHORQUEZ and RALPH FOUBISTER
Defendant:
MARIA LUISA DE MORENO PIRAQUIVE, CARLOS ALBERTO BAENA LOPEZ, ALEXANDRA MORENO PIRAQUIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Raul Rodriguez
as 16-1727
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Julian Rodriguez a/k/a Carlos Heriberto Rios Cabello
Claudia Flores-Rios v. Attorney General United State
as 16-1277
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA PATRICIA FLORES-RIOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Araceli Rios v. Attorney General United States
as 13-4791
Petitioner:
ARACELI RIOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RIOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv05649
Petitioner:
JEFFREY RIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2013mc00367
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC, ROSE MARKETING, LLC, DEPAOLA MARKETING, LLC and others
Receiver:
PETER S. DAVIS
Linda Metcalf, et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, et al
as 13-3118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA METCALF, MICHELLE HARTLEY, FILMWEST PRODUCTIONS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC, LAWRENCE R. BELLMORE, JR., SOLAR WIND PRODUCTIONS, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
