Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Jez, et al. v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2019cv00889
Defendant:
Gene L. Ashe, Oren G. Shaffer, Bradley S. Jacobs and others
Nominal Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adriana Jez and Erin Candler
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account v. CA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01251
Defendant:
Christopher Lofgren, Jens Alder, Jeffrey Katz and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Barrett v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01219
Defendant:
Christopher A. Holden, Joey A. Jacobs, Carol J. Burt and others
Plaintiff:
Jon Barrett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jacobs v. Premiere Credit of North America, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01132
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Premiere Credit of North America, LLC
Plaintiff:
Amelia Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosenblatt v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01077
Defendant:
Christopher A. Holden, Joey A. Jacobs, Carol J. Burt and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
White v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01068
Plaintiff:
James P. White
Defendant:
Christopher A. Holden, Joey A. Jacobs, Carol J. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Franchi v. Orbotech Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv00839
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Defendant:
Orbotech Ltd., Yochai Richter, Yehudit Bronicki and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jacobs v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jacobs
Defendant:
McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
